PA Business Leaders Sell Out Orie In Supreme Court Race October 8 2009
PA Business Leaders Sell Out Orie In Supreme Court Race
BY CHRIS FREIND
If there’s one word to describe the Pennsylvania business community, it’s consistent, as in consistently pathetic.
The state’s business leaders — and that description is a stretch— once again dropped the political ball and, in all likelihood, will be the biggest losers after next month’s state Supreme Court election —
one of the most important in decades. With the court deadlocked 3-3, the winner will shape the court’s direction for years to come. Republican Joan Orie Melvin and Democrat Jack Panella, both judges on the Superior Court, are duking it out.
Panella has outraised Orie Melvin by a wide margin, thanks to huge financial support from labor unions and trial lawyers. While Orie Melvin is certainly still a viable candidate, it’s no secret that whoever touts the largest warchest has a distinct advantage.
Why the large gap between the two? Enter the business community, or, more accurately, lack thereof.
Pennsylvania’s business leaders, for the most part, have sat on their hands, preferring the view from the sidelines, as is virtually always the case.
While Orie Melvin struggles to keep pace, Panella enjoys the nonstop support of the archenemies of business. Why?
Because when it comes to politics, the business community is lazy, incompetent, and clueless. That is a broad stroke, to be sure, for there are executives who innately understand what’s at stake (check out those in Luzerne County in northeastern PA) but courageous and politically savvy business folk are definitely the exception.
Pennsylvania business leaders make many excuses for their failures, but most common among their inane babble is that they “just want to run their companies, and don’t have time for politics.”
Two points:
1)That’s a cop-out. Make time. Organized labor and the trial lawyers do.
2)Business is governed by politics. Period. Every aspect of business is conducted in accordance with the political environment: regulations, health care, liability, taxes, etc. The list never ends.
What part of this can’t these guys understand?
Let’s make this simple.
If one candidate is strongly backed by labor and lawyers, then a business leader should support the other person, financially and otherwise. And no, it’s not beneath you to host a coffee klatch, put up a yard sign, form a political action committee, or, God forbid, stuff an envelope. Those “pedestrian” things win elections.
But despite business’ complete disregard for the political process, they are always the first to complain when something doesn’t go their way.
Which, this being Pennsylvania – home of the worst business climate in the nation – is an everyday occurrence.
Newsflash: if you bang your head against a wall nine times, you will get the same result on the tenth try.
But this incomprehensible behavior should come as no surprise.
The Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce, chaired by David Cohen, one of Ed Rendell’s biggest fundraisers and closest advisers, actually thought the recent 100 per cent increase in the Philadelphia sales tax was a good thing. So much for the Chamber’s stated goal of sensible tax policy.
Where was the business community when the Fair Share Act came up for a vote not long ago (a bill that would have limited a defendant’s liability to only his share of responsibility)? Nonexistent, because they naively believed Gov. Rendell’s campaign pledge that he would sign it. Instead, he vetoed it.
Unlike business leaders, the trial lawyers didn’t need a proctologist to find their head. And guess what? They won.
We own the second highest corporate net income tax in the country. Onerous and often unnecessary regulations placed on our companies by unaccountable bureaucrats with no real-world experience stifle job growth, innovation and productivity. And instead of being phased out, our capital stock and franchise tax has found new life.
But where is the outcry regarding the state’s ever increasing taxes, which, by the way, result in companies and jobs fleeing Pennsylvania in droves? Nowhere to be heard.
And there is barely a whimper at the prospect of taxing to death those companies drilling for natural gas in the Marcellus Shale, a blossoming industry which, if not destroyed by our politicians, will create thousands upon thousands of good-paying, long-term jobs.
The manufacturing economy is little more than a distant memory, and our hostile legal climate has increased the cost of doing business in Pennsylvania to the point that we are virtually dead last in America for job creation.
The message should be absolutely clear — elected officials will act only when these issues become ones they cannot escape, whether at debates between candidates as they run for re-election, at meetings with community leaders in their districts, visiting a coffee shop, or giving a speech to a service club.
But that won’t happen unless the attitude of business changes. And since attitude reflects leadership, don’t hold your breath.
So if Mr. Panella happens to win, watch for the business community to emerge yelling and screaming after the court upholds its first ludicrous jackpot jury award or company-killing regulation.
And when they do, I have a message for those hypocrites: Look in the mirror, and don’t let the door hit you in the derrière as you fade into oblivion.
Chris Freind, author of “Freindly Fire,” is an independent columnist and investigative reporter whose readers hail from six continents, thirty countries, and all fifty states. He can be reached at CF@FreindlyFireZone.com
Possibly Related...
Comments, compliments or complaints?
Email Chris Freind, Join the other 8 commenters or Share This...
karlub Oct 8
Could the explanation– at least in the Supreme Court race– merely be fear of backing the wrong horse?
If we weren’t in a recession, they would probably be cutting checks to both. But we are, so they’re avoiding it entirely.
This is a case study in something I try and explain to my GOP colleagues all the time: What is good for markets and what is good for pre-existing business interests are different things.
Business leaders aren’t interested in transparent pricing, low barriers to entry, and regulatory egalitarianism. They are interested in protecting their own market share. To that end, they don’t care who’s on the Supreme Court. They just care that– whoever it is– that person is an ally only when their particular business interests are at stake.
PAGOPGUY Oct 8
Let’s not ignore that two-thirds of Orie Melvin’s campaign cash in the last cycle came from trial lawyers as well. Given that, I’m not sure how pro-business she can be.
Chris Freind Oct 8
Karlub-
Interesting points. But how is it that the recession has only affected business, but labor unions and trial lawyers continue to throw big money around? And what is the excuse of business for not getting involved when the economy was robust?
The PA business community is responsible for the destruction of our state’s economy.
And as far as trial lawyer money, Orie received only 20% of what Panella did. That’s the trial bar hedging its bet.
This sad situation is all too common.
CF
karlub Oct 8
Kind of making this up as I go, Chris, but I would say it’s this: The business community wants to suck up to whoever is in power, or whoever is ascendant. At the state level in Pennsylvania, perhaps they just aren’t sure where to place their money.
Chris Freind Oct 8
And my point is… if that is true, and they can’t decide between a candidate heavily backed by labor and trial lawyers and one who is not, they shouldn’t be in business. The direction of the court hangs in the balance. They will be the first to complain when the court rules on something unfavorable to them.
High taxes, ludicrous regulations, skyrocketing health care costs…these are anathema to ALL businesses. True leaders would stand opposed.
The business community has no one to blame for its woes but itself.
Kirby Sensenig Oct 9
I just spent 3 hours with Judge Orie Melvin this morning. I am a small business owner who employees 70 people here is PA. When I left that meeting with her I can tell you am am backing her 100%. Not only with my vote but with a contribution. This is a woman of utmost integrity who will strictly interpret the law. She has not and will not legislate from the bench! Business leaders of PA, please support this woman for PA Supreme Court. This election may very well be more important than next years governers race! When the supreme court rules on something, it’s final!