Re: Hume

David Hume, the most gregarious of philosophers (he was often referred to as “Good David”), often had Benjamin Franklin as a house guest when Ben was in England. Imagine being a dinner guest one of those evenings when Hume and Franklin were discussing philosophy and Adam Smith dropped over to show off his latest chapter in “The Wealth of Nations”.

Hume also provided a refuge for the foul wretch Jean-Jacques Rousseau when he had to flee the Continent. Rousseau, true to his vile nature however, responded to Hume’s benevolence with charges that Hume was part of a conspiracy to silence him. Hume was forced to publish his correspondence to refute Rousseau’s lies and the two men’s relationship ended in bitter acrimony [at least on Rousseau's part].

The relationship between Rousseau and Hume has always for me symbolized the differences between the cold, inhuman rationality of the French enlightenment, which ended in revolutionary terror and tyranny, and the much more humane and generous Scottish enlightenment which contributed greatly to the Anglo-American tradition of liberal tolerance. [I mean "liberal" in its classic form]

 

Comments, compliments or complaints?

Email DB Light, Start the discussion or Share This...

Save My Ballot Tour @ KOP with Pat Toomey

Americans For Prosperity are sponsoring a ‘Save My Ballot’ Tour across Pennsylvania. I was happy to have the opportunity to catch one of these gatherings and am excited to share the video of Pat Toomey’s speech with you all!

Don’t forget to check out Pat’s organization ‘Club For Growth’!

FYI for tech geeks: The video was taken with a Canon HG10 AVCHD and edited using Sony Vegas 8.0. Today I received my Flip MinoHD and will post a Vlog using the video camera in a day or two.

 

Comments, compliments or complaints?

Email TaniaGail, Start the discussion or Share This...

NY-20 Not to Be Decided for Weeks

With 100% of precincts reporting in the special election in New York’s 20th Congressional District, the Democrat is ahead by 65 votes – that’s a 0.04% lead. There are supposedly thousands of absentee ballots to count, and then after those are counted, we’ll almost certainly see this go to court for weeks and weeks. Isn’t our electoral system wonderful?

The good news: Military absentee ballots should favor the Republican.

The bad news: We all know that the longer they have to “count” the votes, the more votes Democrats manage to “find”.

More bad news: The Republican is supposedly only somewhat conservative in the first place. Still, him winning means the Democrats lose, so that’s the better outcome.

Update

A little more bad news: After doing a bit of research I find that Democrat candidate Scott Murphy is an extremist liberal on just about every issue except for guns. National security, the economy, the environment, right to life, you name it – he’s a big time lefty who can’t wait to start asking Obama how he should vote. Fantastic.

 

Comments, compliments or complaints?

Email John Lewandowski, Start the discussion or Share This...

Re: Obama the Economic Tyrant

I don’t know who said it on talk radio yesterday, but it makes perfect sense to me:

If you’re going to depose the head of an organization that’s repeatedly failed our economy, why not get rid of the head of the NEA?

Oh, yeah-h-h,…the NEA poured millions into your coronation,…campaign, Can’t bite the hand that feeds, even if it kan’t reed!

 

Comments, compliments or complaints?

Email Ed Angiolillo, Start the discussion or Share This...

Senseless Keg regulation

State Sen Greenleaf wants beer kegs to be tagged in order to identify the adult who purchased the beer, theoretically deterring adults from buying kegs or underage drinkers.
(h/t grassrootspa)

Whose first illicit beer was from a keg? Does it matter?

Isn’t it easier for kids to hide bottles of liquor or beer rather than giant metal barrels?

I don’t recall New York’s keg tag laws deterring much underage drinking when I was attending college, not even from kegs.

Tracy Collie of Bucks Co. MADD: “Prior studies have shown the public would support this.”

How about some studies showing a positive impact on underage drinking? Or on deaths from alcohol poisoning? Or anything at all that goes beyond making some people feel good and actually impacts human behavior? Then maybe, MAYBE, we’ll talk about adding some nuisance regulation.

Or better yet, why don’t we decriminalize and demystify the consumption of alcohol, at least down to age 18? With all the rampant European-ization of America going on right now, why don’t we try that one?

 

Comments, compliments or complaints?

Email Joe Collins, Start the discussion or Share This...

Re: The Economic Tyrant

Barney Frank is vying for that title as well.

Washington Examiner reports Frank’s committee has approved the “Pay for Performance Act of 2009,” a bill that goes way beyond the AIG bonuses to regulate all pay for all employees of companies receiving government money:

It would, like the tax measure, be retroactive, changing the terms of compensation agreements already in place. And it would give Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner extraordinary power to determine the pay of thousands of employees of American companies.

All companies with gov’t money, retroactively, against all employees, at the discretion of the Treasury Secretary.  Sounds swell.  I think Geithner needs a few more projects to work on… he’s not busy enough right now.

In addition, the bill gives Geithner the authority to decide what pay is “unreasonable” or “excessive.” And it directs the Treasury Department to come up with a method to evaluate “the performance of the individual executive or employee to whom the payment relates.”

Frank has previously expressed an interest in regulating all executive pay, regardless of government involvement.

As one might assume, there’s a better way to address “excessive” executive pay than to have Barney Frank figure it out. We could fix corporate governance, as activist investor Carl Icahn has been saying for a long time.

Why don’t we listen to the guys with some skin in the game?  Why don’t we give shareholders the power to be a check on the companies they ostensibly own?

As far as GM goes, it’s hard to defend Wagoner, but there’s little reason to think that the new CEO will do any better.  Obama firing Wagoner was a strategic move to pave the way for more bailout money by throwing somebody into the volcano to appease the gods electorate.

 

Comments, compliments or complaints?

Email Joe Collins, Start the discussion or Share This...

Matthews: Palin A Mail Order Bride

I realize that Chris Matthews isn’t running for Senate, but still..

What a dick….

…. it runs in the family.

 

Comments, compliments or complaints?

Email AlexC, Start the discussion or Share This...

Glenn Beck Takes CT AG to the Woodshed

Glenn Beck took the Conn. AG to the woodshed, deservedly so, over the Federal Government’s violation of contract with AIG – more commonly known as teh AIG bonus scandal.  He asked the most important question that no one, has asked those who swear an oath – “What law did they break?”  The AG is a disgrace.  Our elected officials need to be hounded more, not just from people like Glenn Beck – especially if they are violating their oath of office.

 

Comments, compliments or complaints?

Email Matt Best, Start the discussion or Share This...

Obama: The Economic Tyrant

In the wake of the ouster of General Motors’ CEO earlier this week, one thing is plainly clear: The President of the United States  is now the de-facto CEO of the auto industry, banking and lending industry, and of AIG. During this past week, we witnessed a string of government power grabs that has led us closer to an economic system of socialism than at any time in our history.

We witnessed the US Treasury print $1 trillion in new money to partner with investors to buy toxic assets from ailing banks. We saw the White House empower itself to take over banks, financial lenders, and insurance companies at the stroke of the President’s pen. We watched dumbfounded as President Obama fired Rick Wagoner and ordered the Chrysler board of directors to merge with another company by month’s end or face complete government takeover.

All this from a man who has NEVER run so much as a lemonade stand in his entire life.

When did we become Venezuela, Jr.? And when will the American people take notice that their freedom is being stolen right out from underneath them?

 

Comments, compliments or complaints?

Email Hank Clarke, Start the discussion or Share This...

David Hume on Obama’s debt

David Hume was a Scottish philosopher during the 1700’s, otherwise known as the Scottish enlightenment.  Adam Smith, who wrote the Wealth of Nations, another Scottsman, was a friend of his and Smith was most likely influenced by Hume.  These were true intellectuals, not dolts who were made to look intelligent by reading from a teleprompter.  Here’s what he said about public debt (Part II, Essay IX, paragraph 5 of Hume’s Political Discourses, published in 1752):

It is very tempting to a minister to employ such an expedient, as enables him to make a great figure during his administration, without overburthening the people with taxes, or exciting any immediate clamours against himself. The practice, therefore, of contracting debt will almost infallibly be abused, in every government. It would scarcely be more imprudent to give a prodigal son a credit in every banker’s shop in London, than to impower a statesman to draw bills, in this manner, upon posterity.

 

Comments, compliments or complaints?

Email Matt Best, Start the discussion or Share This...

Every Conservative Should Say This

“People cannot look at this woman. I really think they’re afraid of her and her morals, ethics and values and the fact that she hangs on them. Is she the most experienced person in the world? But she was running to be the Vice President, so we then put the most inexperienced person as the President. That didn’t make any sense to me.”

-Actress Angie Harmon, talking about Sarah Palin

How is it that an actress is better at articulating a defense of Sarah Palin than anyone in the Republican leadership? Every time SARAH is trashed by the left, we should reply in a similar fashion.

Last night, a Democrat hack was one of several folks on Hannity’s show. Near the end of the discussion, the topic of Sarah Palin possibly being the next Republican presidential nominee came up. On the idea of going from candidate McCain to candidate Palin, the Democrat hack said, “Talk about going from hero to zero.” This outrageous statement went unchallenged by Hannity, who could have and should have said something like Ms. Harmon’s quote above.

 

Comments, compliments or complaints?

Email John Lewandowski, Start the discussion or Share This...

News Bias at the “Paper of Record”

Michael Tremogli writes in the Philadelphia Bulletin,

A lawyer involved with legal action against Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) told a House Judiciary subcommittee on March 19 The New York Times had killed a story in October that would have shown a close link between ACORN, Project Vote and the Obama campaign because it would have been a “a game changer.”

Heather Heidelbaugh, who represented the Pennsylvania Republican State Committee in the lawsuit against the group, recounted for the ommittee what she had been told by a former ACORN worker who had worked in the group’s Washington, D.C. office. The former worker, Anita Moncrief, told Ms. Heidelbaugh last October, during the state committee’s litigation against ACORN, she had been a “confidential informant for several months to The New York Times reporter, Stephanie Strom.”

Ms. Moncrief had been providing Ms. Strom with information about ACORN’s election activities. Ms. Strom had written several stories based on information Ms. Moncrief had given her.

During her testimony, Ms. Heidelbaugh said Ms. Moncrief had told her The New York Times articles stopped when she revealed that the Obama presidential campaign had sent its maxed-out donor list to ACORN’s Washington, D.C. office.

Read the whole thing here.

Emphasis mine.

Of course, who would expect anything different from the NYT.

 

Comments, compliments or complaints?

Email DB Light, Start the discussion or Share This...

re:Murtha’s “if”

I’m thinking this is like O.J. Simpson’s “If I did it.”

 

Comments, compliments or complaints?

Email Joe Collins, Start the discussion or Share This...

But at least we still have our li-berries…

WPVI:

A deadly fire has devastated three generations of a Philadelphia family. Authorities say working smoke detectors probably would have made a life-saving difference.

The flames broke out just before 1:00 a.m. in the 1400 block of North Newkirk Street in the Brewerytown section of North Philadelphia.

When firefighters arrived they found flames spitting out of both the first and second floors. When the smoke settled, three females were dead – a daughter, mother and grandmother.

The victims have been identified as 48-year-old Jacqueline Cooper, 32-year-old Tia Cooper and 8-year-old Kyra Cooper.

We’re told Tia Cooper died after jumping out of a second story window. The bodies of her 8-year-old daughter and 48-year-old mother were found in a second floor bedroom.

Captain America, a Philly firefighter blogging over at First In, is perhaps the only one in the media connecting the dots from Fire Department cutbacks to fire related deaths in Philadelphia. Cap used to work this neighborhood and his comments are worth quoting at length:

But small houses burn hot. Fires in these kind of dwellings are typically intense but short lived affairs for firefighters. Most of the time they are knocked down within minutes. Unfortunately for many residents however, the intensity of these fires often proves fatal.

For people who live in these neighborhoods, quick reaction by the Fire Department is often the difference between life and death especially for the elderly, infirm or the very young. Ironically the three groups represented in this mornings body count. A woman, her daughter and her granddaughter all perished in this tiny home.

Although this fire is a tragedy there is an insidious byline that makes it not only tragic, but DISGUSTING. This fire happened just BLOCKS from LADDER 01’s station. I guess I don’t have to tell everyone that Ladder 01 was CLOSED by the Nutter administration earlier this year. As we predicted the bodies continue to pile up and not a peep from the Mayor’s office. What is even more foul is that Philly’s own local media, reporting from the scene of the tragedy REFUSED to even mention the fact. How can an unbiased, neutral media, an bona fide news agency like Ch.06 ABC IGNORE this obvious connection and not even broach the subject while interviewing the Fire Commissioner at the scene? That is simply inexcusable and unforgivable. But typical. The news media in Philly is squarely in the tank for the Nutter admimistration. They could care less how many people die as a result of Fire Department cutbacks. The news media only cares about access to the administration so they will never go after stories that can show the Mayor in a negative light. It’s that simple.

Instead they go after a missing smoke detector angle. They are subtly trying to implicate the family in their own demise. It doesn’t matter that a woman JUMPED TO HER DEATH FROM A SECOND FLOOR WINDOW when Ladder 01 probably could have saved her. That isn’t even mentioned in the coverage. Reporters are cowards and when they slant their coverage or ignore the real facts they deserve to be unemployed.

It’s disgusting and I’m sick of it.

 

Comments, compliments or complaints?

Email LisaMossie, Start the discussion or Share This...

Murtha: On Why He Might be Corrupt

If. < - a big "if.”

If I’m corrupt, it’s because I take care of my district,” Mr. Murtha said. “My job as a member of Congress is to make sure that we take care of what we see is necessary. Not the bureaucrats who are unelected over there in whatever White House, whether it’s Republican or Democrat. Those bureaucrats would like to control everything. Every president would like to have all the power and not have Congress change anything. But we’re closest to the people.”

(h/t Politico)

 

Comments, compliments or complaints?

Email AlexC, Start the discussion or Share This...

Liberals Finally to Acknowledge Adult Stem Cell Research?

Via HotAir, Stem cells to grow bigger breasts:

A STEM cell therapy offering “natural” breast enlargement is to be made available to British women for the first time.

The treatment could boost cup size while reducing stomach fat. It involves extracting stem cells from spare fat on the stomach or thighs and growing them in a woman’s breasts. An increase of one cup size is likely, with the potential for larger gains as the technique improves.

A trial has already started in Britain to use stem cells to repair the breasts of women who have had cancerous lumps removed. A separate project is understood to be the first in Britain to use the new technique on healthy women seeking breast enlargement.

Note that the stem cells used were adult stem cells derived from fat, not from embryos. I figure if anything would make liberals acknowledge the effectiveness of adult stem cell research, it’s this news. But, if they do decide to start promoting this success, they will probably attribute it to Barack Obama.

 

Comments, compliments or complaints?

Email John Lewandowski, Start the discussion or Share This...

Bobby Casey: I’m Pro-Life, Honest!

Now, he is the most pro-life Democrat in the Senate, but unfortunately, that’s not saying much.

Aid for pregnant women key to fewer abortions by Sen. Bob Casey

I am a pro-life Democrat. I believe that life begins at conception and ends when we draw our last breath and that we must protect life at every point in that process.

Actually, Bobby, you believe that life begins at implantation. At least, you would have to, considering your support for emergency contraception, which can destroy a fertilized egg by preventing it from implanting in the womb. You certainly couldn’t support something that you think destroys an innocent unborn life, now could you?

My actions as a U.S. senator have been consistent with this philosophy. I have voted against federal funding of stem cell research that would destroy living embryos.

Sure, you voted against it… while campaigning for the very man who, by executive order, forced federal funding of stem cell research that would destroy living embryos. But you had to support Obama, because he’s… uh… for hope and change, yeah, that’s the ticket!

I have voted to codify the federal regulation that provides unborn children with health coverage under the Children’s Health Insurance Program.

How bold of you to vote for an expansion to a government program! I’m sure that made you plenty of enemies in the Democratic Party.

I have voted to prohibit funding to organizations that support coercive abortions.

And yet you supported Obama’s repeal of the Mexico City Policy, thereby forcing us all fund foreign organizations which perform abortions. Your justification? That you want to help these organizations buy condoms for people. Wonderful. Next we can help Hamas buy food for widows.

I have voted to prohibit circumvention of parental involvement in abortion decisions.

Of course, unfortunately, the presidential candidate you strongly endorsed wants to pass the FOCA. But it’s OK, because according to you, Congress will never pass the FOCA. Right.

I have consistently supported the Hyde Amendment and the Helms Amendment regarding federal funding of abortions or abortion-related services.

Yep, more pro-life legislation which is on Obama’s chopping block. Who did you support for president, again, Bobby?

And I have worked closely with the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and other faith groups to introduce S. 270, the Pregnant Women Support Act — last year and again last month. This legislation would reduce the number of abortions by providing health care, education, counseling, nutrition, pre-natal care, and information for pregnant women.

Kudos to you for that, Casey, and I mean it. I do support that. But again, you can hardly be called a hero for voting for an expansion in government power. It’s not like Democrats have any qualms with that.

Many pro-life activists talk about one strategy only — the appointment of a justice who may tip the Supreme Court against Roe v.Wade.

Wrong, Bobby. Most pro-life activists also seek to help pregnant women, whether through government aid or private charities and churches.

I understand this approach. I, too, believe that Roe was wrongly decided. I strongly oppose the Freedom of Choice Act which would codify the Roe decision. While this bill has not been introduced, I will oppose it if it is introduced.

Too bad we don’t have a president who would have vetoed it. Too bad you didn’t campaign for a candidate who would have vetoed it.

What we don’t often hear is the reality that overturning Roe will not outlaw abortions — it will send the question to state legislatures. Many states will legalize abortion in some or most circumstances. And that is assuming that five justices will put aside the principal of stare decisis and overturn a 35-year-old ruling.

So, Bobby, you believe that Roe was wrongly decided, but then you whine that overturning it would be a violation of stare decisis? Make up your mind, will you? Either Roe is constitutional or it isn’t.

What are we doing now to help the unborn? Does the fifth-justice strategy help support pregnant women who need help in order to choose life? Does it help women think through their options? Does it provide assistance to teenagers and college students so they can have their babies and stay in school? Does it help pregnant women who have abusive partners get the support they need? Does it eliminate pregnancy as a pre-existing condition in the individual health insurance market? Does it provide home visitation to young mothers without support? The answer, sadly, is no. Neither party does enough to help pregnant women.

Does campaigning for a pro-abortion president help women choose life? Does supporting a pro-abortion party help women choose life? Does funding Planned Parenthood, which encourages women to abort, help women choose life? Does Obama’s plan to discourage charitable giving help women choose life? Does teaming up with organizations who think that unborn children are worthless blobs of tissue to help you get elected help women choose life? Does the Democratic Party leadership’s endless mockery of pro-lifers and endless attacks on so-called “conservative” Catholics help women choose life? I agree that neither party does enough to help pregnant women, but it would certainly help if YOUR party would stop fighting tooth and nail to ensure that women kill their “inconvenient” children.

My bill would address these urgent priorities. It also would provide funding for centers that help pregnant women, young mothers and babies with such critical needs as child care, educational support, counseling, parenting classes, business skills training, emergency aid, nutrition education and food assistance.

As someone said to your lackey during the March for Life, this is a no-brainer which should have been passed years ago. One would have to wonder why the Democratic Party, which never saw an increase in government power it didn’t like, hasn’t already done this.

Recent research finds that the abortion rate among women living below the poverty level ($10,830 in 2009) is more than four times that of women with an annual income above 300 percent of the poverty level, or $32,490. We know that 48 percent of all pregnancies are unintended and, excluding miscarriages, 54 percent of unintended pregnancies end in abortion. “Cannot afford a baby” is the second most frequently cited reason why women choose to have an abortion and 73 percent of women having abortions cited it as a contributing factor.

So women abort because they cannot afford a baby? That’s not very “pro-choice”, is it? Maybe you should tell that to the leaders of your party who insist that women need abortion because they need bodily autonomy.

A woman facing the challenges of an unplanned pregnancy that may be a crisis for her does not need a lecture from a politician or a clinical reminder that she has a simple choice to make. The choice is never simple. Never. This woman needs support and understanding — and genuine assistance. She needs to be embraced in her time of crisis, not sent on her way to deal with it on her own. She needs our help; she needs us to walk with her, not only throughout the nine months of her pregnancy, but also for the early months and years of her child’s life.

Too bad your party doesn’t agree with the scientific reality that the unborn child is in fact a child. Instead we are forced to argue with your party whether or not an unborn child should have legal protections or if it’s just a blob of tissue. Obviously if it’s a child and not a blob it’s much easier to protect its rights and secure assistance for it through government aid and private charities. Wouldn’t you agree?

When I re-introduced the Pregnant Women Support Act, I renewed my hope and determination to achieve genuine common ground in reducing abortions. The research clearly shows that economic and social supports like those in my bill effectively reduce abortions. Surely we can all agree that this approach must be part of the solution to this decades-old battle — a battle that has achieved little other than bitter polarization and stalemate. My bill will reduce the number of abortions in America.

You’re right, it will. That’s why I support it. I’m shocked it wasn’t already passed ages ago. But you know what else would reduce the number of abortions in America? Having a pro-life president who supports pro-life legislation and pro-life judges. Maybe you should find a pro-life presidential candidate so you can join his or her campaign.

Polarizing rhetoric and false choices don’t help the unborn. Supporting pregnant women does. As we embark on a new era in our country, I ask Pennsylvanians to join me, to join together in common purpose to truly help pregnant women so that many more will choose life for their unborn children.

I support the Pregnant Women Support Act, Bobby, because this is something that should have passed a long time ago. Who could possibly be against helping pregnant women? Unfortunately, YOUR party insists that ONLY government can help pregnant women. YOUR party plans to discourage citizens from giving to charities which help pregnant women. YOUR party makes any and all pro-life activists out to be evil beasts who hate women. YOUR party is in bed with NARAL, Planned Parenthood, and other horrible pro-abortion organizations which sell sex and abortion to teenagers.

How can I or any other pro-lifer take you seriously when you happily and enthusiastically campaigned for the most pro-abortion and most anti-Catholic president we have ever had? You’re right about us embarking on a “new era”, Bobby, but it will be an era of inhumanity, and the Obama years will go down in history as a time of hopelessness where the only “change” was for the worse. The only hope for America lies in prying power out of the hands of the Democratic Party as soon as possible.

 

Comments, compliments or complaints?

Email John Lewandowski, Join the other 2 commenters or Share This...

Re: lager

In my poker group, we rotate buying cases of beer. You’re only allowed to buy two brands of beer: Yuengling and Sam Adams.

 

Comments, compliments or complaints?

Email Ed Angiolillo, Start the discussion or Share This...

Notre Dame Petitions

If you agree with me that Barack Obama, who is using his power as president as a bludgeon against Catholics, should not be honored by the University of Notre Dame, please sign these petitions:

Notre Dame Scandal

Project Sycamore

 

Comments, compliments or complaints?

Email John Lewandowski, Start the discussion or Share This...

Lager’s First Name

Picking up on Alex’s beer theme…

The Patriot-News has a write-up on Yuengling and how it is “within a pint or two of surpassing the Boston Beer Co. and its Samuel Adams brands in sales,” which would make it the largest American-owned brewery.

Considering that Yuengling isn’t a national brand like Sam Adams is, that’s saying something.

Some graphics in the print edtion of the paper (text-ified here) tell us Lager accounts for 85% of sales.  (How is the Porter less than 1% of sales?  That’s good stuff.)

 

Comments, compliments or complaints?

Email Joe Collins, Start the discussion or Share This...