Honoring hallowed ground

My husband and I spent this past Fourth of July weekend at Gettysburg, PA. I blogged about it upon my return, but felt then and still feel now that my words were inadequate in describing the experience. As I noted then, the 2 1/2 hour Segueway tour we took on Sunday was the perfect way to see the Battlefield and really get a sense of what happened there. I am ashamed to admit that prior to my visit, my knowledge of the Battle of Gettysburg was woefully inadequate.

In any event, I feel now that the experince of Gettysburg moved me like no other trip ever has. Touring the battlefield’s gently rolling, peaceful hills, while in my mind’s eye, superimposing the images of battle, dead and wounded was an experince I won’t soon forget. Indeed, I am currently reliving it through a book one of my readers recommended, called “The Killer Angels.” Whether I am finding this book so engrossing because it so vividly brings the story alive, or because I found the experience of Gettysburg so emotionally touching, I don’t know, but like my reader, I highly recommend the book (Thanks, Art!).

Prior to my visit, I used to think that the re-enactments had a flavor of hokiness, but after seeing a couple, I have come to view them as a way to honor history and keep it alive. To be sure, the town of Gettysburg has it’s share of honky-tonk attractions: ghost tours, “dramatized” battlefield tours, privately run tourist trap museums, tee shirt shops with pictures of Lincoln wearing an iPod, etc. These things run the gamut from mildly exploitive to offensive, but they all are predicated on what happened at Gettysburg.

So when I heard about a developer who wanted to build a casino on Emmitsburg Road a mere half a mile from the boundary of Gettysburg National Park, it just didn’t seem right. Inky:

The developer of a proposed casino in Gettysburg today called the historic community “the last untapped gaming marketplace” in Pennsylvania, and contended that his project would create jobs and revitalize the area while respecting its rich history and tradition.

David LeVan, the Adams County resident proposing the casino, told state gaming board officials at a packed hearing that his $75 million Mason-Dixon Resort & Casino project would have a “tremendous economic development” impact on the county and would not affect Gettysburg National Military Park, one of the nation’s first “hallowed” grounds.

He also said that many other towns and communities – including Philadelphia, Valley Forge, and Deadwood, S.D. – have shown that gambling and “heritage tourism” can successfully coexist.

“This can be done right,” LeVan said. “This will be done well.”

The “Mason-Dixon Hotel Resort and Casino?” Even the name sounds hokey. And sorry, I’m not quite buying “the last untapped gaming marketplace in Pennsylvania” line. I don’t want to question Mr. LaVan’s motives here, but why Gettysburg if not to capitalize on the tourist base that already comes here to honor history? Somehow the flashing lights and bells of slot machines, cheesy lounge acts, scampily clad cocktail waitresses and drunken revelry don’t seem in to be in keeping with the spirit of sacrifice and destiny that lives at Gettysburg.

Just as there should be no mosque at Ground Zero, just as there should be no shortcut road through Fernwood Cemetary to Spring-Ford High School there are ways to respect hallowed ground and there are definite ways to disrespect it.

After hearing pleas from several members of the public about the potential impact on Fernwood Cemetery, the Spring-Ford Area School Board shelved its plan for an easement for a driveway to connect the high school to Walnut Street.

The board voted 5-3 against a resolution that would have authorized acquisition of an easement on parcels owned by PD Roy L.L.C. and Royersford Cemetery L.L.C. The proposed driveway was intended to reduce traffic on Lewis Road because of the high school.

Monica Rebbie, of Limerick Township, acknowledged that the planned driveway would not have disturbed any graves in the cemetery. But she told the board that the proposed route was only yards from where her baby was buried.

Rebbie said she recognized that there was a need to alleviate traffic on Lewis Road. “I don’t think going through the cemetery is the answer,” she added. Rebbie said the driveway would create noise in the cemetery, and she asked the board members if they would want that to happen where their loved ones were buried.

In the case of Fernwood Cemetary and Ground Zero, relatives of the dead can speak on behalf of the departed regarding how they want them to be honored and conversely, how they don’t want the ground where they died treated. In the case of Gettysburg, we all must speak on behalf of the honored dead. We owe that to the men who sacrificed their lives for this country.

No one is questioning LeVan’s right to build the casino; we are questioning the wisdom of building a casino in this location.  We are asking to keep this ground sacred and remember what happened here, not cheapen it with an exploitive tourist attraction.

No casino at Gettysburg.

 

Comments, compliments or complaints?

Email LisaMossie, Start the discussion or Share This...

4th of July Weekend in Gettysburg, PA

Gettysburg, Pennsylvania is a town where history is not forgotten.

My husband and I broke in the new camper with a weekend in the small, and historically significant, Pennsylvania town. On Saturday, we went to the Gettysburg Military History Park, where we watched a film about those three fateful days and toured the museum full of actual relics. Both my husband and I were struck by the size of the uniforms on display, since they all seemed rather small. In several display cases, we found groupings of artifacts from a single soldier; his letters home, his belt buckle, his firearm, etc. What I noticed about many of these correspondences and quotes was the uncynical way both the Union and Confederate soldiers viewed the cause for which they were fighting. They believed in their leaders and they did not express that attitude of the futility of war that is so very fashionable these days.

It was heartening to see how crowded the town was this weekend with families; parents who aren’t content to let the public school field trip experience be the only way their children experience this history. There were license plates from all over the country; I met people in the museum from Hawaii and a family from Nebraska on the Observation deck on Conderate lines. What I did not see: packs of tragically hip yuppies, trendy hippies or Obama bumper stickers.

We toured the battlefields two different ways: On Saturday, after our visit to the National Park, we purchased a tour on a double-decker bus that was accompanied by a “dramatization” of the events that occured there via padded headphones. On Sunday, thanks to a group of Ohioans we met a the Dobbins House immediately following the bus tour, we tried a Segway tour that they recommended, which is truly a wonderful way to tour the Battlefield. Not only are the Segways fun to ride, but the pace of the tour is exactly right, the recorded tour guide is knowledgeable and explains exactly where you are and what occured there as you are passing it, and the tour guides are professional, friendly and hospitable: on our several breaks during the two and a half hour tour of the western battlefield, we were offered pastries, fresh cherries and ice cold water. Info on Segtours can be found here.

I don’t imagine a town can witness the slaughter of 52,000 soldiers on those gently rolling hills and soon forget, and Gettysburg remembers its history.  In fact, despite the potically-correct efforts to cleanse the battle of it’s partisanship (T-shirts in the museum shop bear the catch phrase “Gettysburg:  Our county’s common ground”), there is still a lingering bitterness against the Confederates that is palpable if you are tuned in to it.

The mistakes of the commanders, the bravery of the men and the sheer luck that decided the most consequential battle ever fought is fascinating and humbling. Sometimes, such as in the fight for Little Round Top, it was only a matter of minutes that could have changed the course of the battle, and perhaps the war. The fact that our Union may have just as easily not survived those three days in July in 1863 is a fact that should never be forgotten. And in these days of 2,000 plus word bills and 1 hour plus State of the Union speeches, the simplicity, elegance, and impact of Abraham Lincoln’s three paragraph Gettysburg Address cannot be overstated.

I took a major spill while climbing the rocks of the Devil’s Den (picture above) and count myself lucky; many of our ancestors did not emerg from this place quite so lucky.

This was our first visit to Gettysburg, but it will certainly not be our last. If you have not visited this gem of American history, make sure to do so soon. And make sure to tour the Battlefield with a knowledgable tour guide. There is a quality auto tour you can purchase at the National Park Museum Bookstore for about $40, but the Segways are a quality option as well. Skip the other museums and hokey touristy things(such as the double decker bus with the “Dramatized” tour). Be sure to climb up Little Round Top and the observation deck on the Rebel lines to take in the full expanse of the battlefield.

But most of all, visit. Remember. And honor the sacrifice of the men who died on those three days in July.

 

Comments, compliments or complaints?

Email LisaMossie, Start the discussion or Share This...

Cutting Through The Spin: A Hard-Hitting Analysis Of the PA Governor’s Race

Pennsylvania’s elections this year will be front and center on the national scene, as there are numerous hotly contested congressional races and a U.S. Senate seat up for grabs. But attracting the most attention is the open race for governor.

To cut through the self-serving spin that surrounds elections, Freindly Fire sat down with Pittsburgh-based independent political consultant Michael O’Connell to receive a non-partisan analysis of the gubernatorial primary. O’Connell, who has worked the Pennsylvania political landscape for nearly 25 years, has no personal stake in any of the campaigns.

GOP Race: Corbett Vs. Rohrer

Background

The presumptive Republican nominee in the gubernatorial race is Attorney General Tom Corbett. He has won statewide twice, including 2008, in what was an otherwise horrid year for Republicans.  Corbett’s stunning 400,000 vote margin that year — when Barack Obama carried the state by 600,000 — cemented his status as the gubernatorial frontrunner.   

Corbett has also made headlines for his successful prosecution of legislative corruption, known as the “Bonusgate” scandal, and more recently when he joined other Attorneys-General in supporting a lawsuit against the national health care law.

That success has contributed to a war chest of $4 million.

As a comparison, his opponent, State Representative Sam Rohrer, has raised $500,000, and had only $15,000 in the bank as of the last reporting period.

Rohrer, an 18 year veteran of the state house, touts himself as a constitutional conservative, while Corbett is anchoring his campaign on fiscal discipline, limited government, and free enterprise.

The Attorney General, endorsed by Republican State Committee, holds a commanding lead in the polls, but the Rohrer campaign believes it can win by mobilizing its grassroots machine. Rohrer is not seeking re-election to the House.

Freindly Fire: Despite the fact that Corbett has consistently campaigned on conservative principles, some Tea Partiers and other conservatives are backing Rohrer because of his conservative credentials. Yet Rohrer voted for the infamous unconstitutional payraise in 2005 — when legislators pocketed the money in that term — and voted to increase his pension by 50%.  Do you think some conservatives are giving him a free pass on these issues? Why?

Mike O’Connell:

Here we get to the politics of style versus substance.

For anyone familiar with Harrisburg, the notion that an eighteen-year-legislator, who cast the votes you just mentioned, and who was content to work with House leaders—including former Speaker John Perzel, bravely demonized by many on the Right now that he is no longer in power—is now somehow an outsider and political rebel is just silly.

That’s the substance.  The style is different:  what the “tea party” movement sees is a graduate of Bob Jones University—which it must be said is a pretty good first step in establishing one to be, or at least to have been at age eighteen, out of the political mainstream—who avers that he is an outsider is taken at face value by those who value outsider-ness . . . and to the degree the movement prides itself on not knowing what state government does, ignoring actual votes cast by a flesh-and-blood legislator is not only convenient but can be a badge of honor.

There is also frankly a measure of cynicism among some of Rohrer’s institutional supporters:  a wide array of conservative groups in Harrisburg….

Read the entire analysis at www.FreindlyFirezone.com

Link:

http://www.freindlyfirezone.com/index.php/component/k2/item/46-cutting-through-the-spin-a-frank-analysis-of-the-governor’s-race

Chris Freind is an independent columnist and investigative reporter who operates his own news bureau, www.FreindlyFireZone.com

Readers of his column, “Freindly Fire,” hail from six continents, thirty countries and all fifty states. His work has been referenced in numerous publications including The Wall Street Journal, National Review Online, foreign newspapers, and in Dick Morris’ recent bestseller “Catastrophe.”

Freind also serves as a weekly guest commentator on the Philadelphia-area talk radio show, Political Talk (WCHE 1520), and makes numerous other television and radio appearances.  He can be reached at CF@FreindlyFireZone.com

 

Comments, compliments or complaints?

Email Chris Freind, Join the discussion or Share This...

A Great Conversation with a Fellow American

           I was at a benefits fair on Wednesday this past week representing the company I work for. It was the normal type of event these shows can be, sometimes busy, most times very slow. It was during one of these slow moments when I had a fantastic conversation that comes few times in a person’s life. The kind that is unexpected, out-of-the-blue, and obviously put in motion for a reason only “He” divines at the time, but you take a moment afterward to silently say thank you to him. This was one of those moments.

            His name is Lovell and he is a Doctoral level Professor at a University. We accidentally became engaged in the same conversation about children, specifically about what we are trying to teach our own kids. Now, he is only about 15 or so years older than myself, so his children are only a few years older than my own, so much about what our children are going through and are learning to make decisions on are the same. We spoke about teaching our children history and the need to learn where we come from to learn where we are going. From there though, something happened. I’m not sure what, but the litany of subjects we discussed from there just blossomed; Science, race, God, America, the different religions, society and it’s idolization of bad behavior, the next generation of Americans, the Holocaust and what those that lived through it could teach us, the best way to transport those stories from the survivors mouths to his students ears, on and on and on. It was one of those types of conversation that really lets you seen inside the mind of another human being and what you see is good. Standing before me was a good and decent human being just trying to show his children and the students he touched day after day what it is to be a good person and a good American.

            Now, anyone who has read any of my previous writings knows that I’m a Conservative in the vein of Ronald Reagan; Limited government, low taxes, maximum freedom with minimum intrusion, dyed in the wool Capitalist. I’m fairly certain that my friend, which I hope to call Lovell someday, was a Liberal. He was a tall black man with an “Obama” ball cap, replete with a swoosh to the name and the Obama campaign symbol adorning it. Also, he’s a Sociology professor at a pretty liberal school. The beauty of all of this though is that it didn’t matter. We were just two dads wondering aloud and talking together on what is best needed to raise our kids’ right and to turn them into decent citizens and Americans. This moment and conversation is what it means to be an American. Speaking our mind freely to one another without fear and with respect. We may not believe in the same political concepts or doctrines. We may not even see in the same spectrum about the “-ism’s” in politics and society. What we could see though was the common goal of our children and doing our damnedest to make sure that they become good people and that life is better for them when they are men talking one day.

            I will reach out to Lovell again, and regardless of our political beliefs, no matter how similar or divergent they may be, I hope that I will be able to call him my friend someday. There is one thing that I have already learned from him though, is that he has given me hope that life will be better and that we as citizens will be able to talk more about what unites us than what divides us. And that I’m proud to call him my Fellow American.

 

Comments, compliments or complaints?

Email Ian Hayes, Join the discussion or Share This...

A Much Needed Kick in the @$$

One of my screaming right-wing buddies sent me a video of a speech by Newt Gingrich. Apparently there are several parts to it, but I only watched the last one.

It’s long, but watch the whole thing–especially the end.

Newt Gingrich on why we must fight

“Don’t tell me how much you’ve given. Don’t tell me how tired you are. Don’t tell me how frustrating it is. This country was created by people who were willing to say ‘Victory or death’ while marching in burlap bags in the middle of a snowstorm.”

 

Comments, compliments or complaints?

Email Fred Mullner, Start the discussion or Share This...

The “Jack Murtha” Philadelphia Navy Shipyard? Just Say NO!

The “Jack Murtha” Philadelphia Navy Shipyard? Just Say NO!

BY CHRIS FREIND
“FREINDLY FIRE”

Reports have surfaced that Pennsylvania Democrats are in favor of naming the iconic Philadelphia Navy Shipyard after the recently-deceased Congressman Jack Murtha.

I have just one question for those who favor of such a preposterous idea— such as Congressman Bob Brady—:

“Hi. I’m Earth. Have we met?”

On what planet are these people living?

Yes, naming the veritable shipyard —one that played a decisive role in the Allies’ victory in World War II — after a man who flagrantly disregarded that old document called The Constitution for his own political benefit seems like a swell idea.

*********
A Vietnam veteran, Murtha knew firsthand how difficult fighting could be on both the battlefield and homefront. One would think a war as controversial as Vietnam, in which soldiers became targets of venomous slurs and unfair accusations by the public and elected officials, would have taught Big Jack the lessons of patience, humility and honor.
One would be wrong.

Read more at The Artorius News Bureau’s FreindlyFireZone.com, and please feel free to post a comment:

http://www.freindlyfirezone.com/index.php/local-news/item/20-the-“jack-murtha”-philadelphia-navy-shipyard?-just-say-no

Chris Freind is an independent columnist and investigative reporter who operates his own new site, The Artorius News Bureau. Readers of his column “Freindly Fire” hail from six continents, thirty countries and all fifty states. His work has been referenced in numerous publications including The Wall Street Journal, National Review Online, foreign newspapers, and in Dick Morris’ recent bestseller “Catastrophe.”
Freind also serves as a weekly guest commentator on a Philadelphia-area talk radio show, WCHE, and makes numerous other television and radio appearances. He can be reached at CF@FreindlyFireZone.com

 

Comments, compliments or complaints?

Email Chris Freind, Start the discussion or Share This...

Individualism in an Uncertain World

The future—that vast expanse of hopes and dreams—was once reserved for restless Americans out to improve their lot. There was going to be bigger houses, faster cars, and better paying jobs in a peaceful world. The fall of the Berlin Wall gave rise to the prospect of widespread prosperity well into the 21st century.

The realities of the last decade, however, spoiled the promise of tomorrow. There was Enron and Iraq, suffocating debt and partisan gridlock. Government and the market, the two prevailing institutions driving America, experienced monumental declines in their reputations. In drawing conclusions from increasing electoral polarization and the ongoing recession, levels of public trust in the powers that be point to a rocky road ahead.

A recent CNN poll found that 86% of Americans believe that government is broken. Tucked away in the findings was a more revealing statistic: 81% of those who say government is broken also insist that it can be restored. But after years of incompetence, how can two battered pillars of our society, Washington and Wall Street, regain our faith in their abilities?

Since the Great Depression, the electorate has shifted between its acceptance of greater social programs and an affinity for accelerated investment in the private sector. Of course, this trend can be partially explained by the actions of ruling coalitions; staples like Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid were introduced and refined under Franklin Roosevelt and Lyndon Johnson. Conversely, the Dow Jones Industrial Average surged in the age of deregulation ushered in by Ronald Reagan and continued under Bill Clinton. Nevertheless, there has been a consistent pattern of placing our fortunes in the hands of others, whether bankers, bureaucrats, or stock traders. The trouble is that the demand for more safety nets and sound investments now exceeds our supply capabilities.

Individual empowerment is often dismissed as the impossible goal of libertarian knuckleheads and Tea Party enthusiasts. Voices on both sides of the political spectrum deride decentralization as a crackpot scheme to abolish government and disrupt the modern way of life. In fact, I want nothing of the kind. Government, like the private sector, should maintain an integral role in the daily lives of everyday Americans. Until life’s opportunities our open for all, our country will always need referees to act as mediators and social advocates. Then again, government cannot be fixed or work efficiently again until individuals, the very people who elect representatives to serve their interests, dramatically alter their needs and behavior.

Sacrifice and self-restraint, embedded in generations tested by economic hardship and world war, are foreign ideals to most of us born since the end of the Vietnam War. Materialism and short-term gratification have replaced modest living and a long-term outlook. Government spending and reckless practices on Wall Street occurred because the public acted in a similar manner, albeit on a smaller scale. We bought things we could not afford and demanded better returns without paying higher taxes. Our desire for freedom at one moment and dependence at the next was bound to collide.

Living within our means is the key to repairing trust in public institutions. Political and financial leaders will only change their ways if we change ours. So make prudent decisions, plan for the years ahead, and lead a healthy lifestyle. Be realistic about what government and the market can and cannot accomplish. If nothing else, we should know that life grants no certainties, expect for the right of individuals to persevere in the face of great unknowns.

 

Comments, compliments or complaints?

Email Michael Stubel, Start the discussion or Share This...

The Super Bowl Saints, Katrina and Corruption: Feel-Good Stories Won’t Rebuild A City

The Super Bowl Saints, Katrina and Corruption
Feel-Good Stories Won’t Rebuild A City

BY CHRIS FREIND
“FREINDLY FIRE”

Off the bat, let’s get a few things straight:

1) New Orleans is a one-of -a-kind city. It should be on everyone’s list to visit at least once.
2) Despite the fact that the Colts will always be Baltimore to me, I am rooting for Indianapolis in the Super Bowl. And not because I am a Manning fan, but due to the nauseating media coverage that if the Saints win the Big Game, that will somehow heal all wounds from Hurricane Katrina.

Gimme a break.

When will people stop living in a fantasy land and speak the truth about what really happened before, during and after Katrina hit? The reality is that, regardless of whether the Saints win, New Orleans is still at risk and will continue to be until the people wake up, and no victorious football team or the infinite number of feel-good puff pieces about NFL players will change that.

People are entitled to their own opinion, but they aren’t entitled to their own set of facts. And here are the facts:

Louisiana in general, and New Orleans in particular, are among the most corrupt places in the country. This is nothing new, and residents have known this for generations. It has become such an ingrained part of the landscape that people have accepted it as a part of life. That’s their choice, but they shouldn’t turn around and expect the rest of the American taxpayers to foot the bill because their corrupt way of life finally caught up with them.

Everyone knows that New Orleans sits in a floodplain, with most of the city below sea level. So in order to protect the Crescent City, a series of levees were constructed. Rather than do the right thing, however, which would have been to follow recommendations designed to protect the city from Category Four or Five hurricanes, many state and city officials thought that diverting levee money to other projects would be a wiser course.

And since much of that funding came from taxpayers in the other 49 states, why not? It’s always a lot more fun to spend OPM— “other people’s money.”

You know kind of worthwhile projects I’m referring to — important ones that put the security of people and property ahead of all else.

Like millions for a Mardi Gras fountain. Fountains have water, and levees are related to water, so who could argue?

Or riverboat gambling schemes. Boats float, so they could just rise right along with hurricane storm surges while people continue to gamble.

Or a host of other projects, like green space, commercial buildings, and….the list goes on. And on, and on.

Because for decades New Orleans dodged the direct-hit hurricane bullet time and again, with storms diverting at the last minute and the city being spared, proper preparations still weren’t made. Many felt they didn’t need them because “God loves New Orleans.” Obvious lessons that should have been learned were simply ignored. Corruption trumped security.

In the aftermath of Katrina, attention shifted from why this wholly avoidable tragedy happened to the horrific response of leaders such as President Bush and New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin.

Coverage of both men’s bumbling was merited, to be sure. But both also had an excuse.

They were incompetent.

Here’s the bottom line. Taxpayers are sick and tired of paying for other people’s mistakes, be they bank bailouts, auto company failures, or cultures of corruption that pad the pockets of the powerful while forsaking everyone else.

And in the larger picture, why should the federal government, which is funded by we the people, have any obligation to rebuild a city constructed in a known flood plain that is regularly visited by hurricanes?

If you want to live there, great. Flood insurance should be mandated. And if it isn’t offered, maybe that’s a clue that the risk outweighs the reward. If that risk is acceptable, fine. But the rest of us shouldn’t have to shoulder the responsibility to be the risk-free safety net for people who choose to live in high-probability disaster areas.

But the icing on the cake is listening to self-serving Louisiana political hacks who get outraged that Washington doesn’t pick up the ENTIRE cost of rebuilding and maintaining New Orleans. To them, I offer Dean Wormer’s legendary advice from “Animal House”— “fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life.”

So if the Saints win the Super Bowl, become “America’s” team in the process, and make everybody feel good, it will only exacerbate the overarching problem that is endemic in this nation: looking the other way and pretending all is well.

Sticking your head in the sand doesn’t change that fact that we will be called upon — again— to pay the bill— again— should New Orleans get slammed by another Katrina.

But given that we’re approaching insolvency as a nation, the safety net of taxpayer dollars may not be there next time.

It’s time the people of New Orleans stop pretending that a Super Bowl solves anything. Fix the problem now, or face the risk of going it alone.

If their city gets leveled— a very real possibility— they will have no one to blame but themselves.

Chris Freind is an independent columnist and investigative reporter whose news site, The Artorius News Bureau, is slated to launch in mid-February. Readers of “Freindly Fire” hail from six continents, thirty countries and all fifty states. Freind also serves as a weekly guest commentator on a Philadelphia-area talk radio show, WCHE, and makes numerous other television and radio appearances. He can be reached at CF@FreindlyFireZone.com

 

Comments, compliments or complaints?

Email Chris Freind, Start the discussion or Share This...

The Limitations of Democracy

President Andrew Jackson prided himself on being the first “outsider” to ascend to the White House. From George Washington to John Quincy Adams, America’s first six chief executives were creatures of the Eastern aristocracy. Jackson, however, was not a member of this established order. While the Founding Fathers sought to apply the ideals of the revolution throughout their terms in office, they were ever cautious of the threat of mobocracy. Political giants of the Jacksonian era, men like Senators John C. Calhoun, Henry Clay, and Daniel Webster, worried that the president’s popularity with the “common man” would diminish their congressional powers and foment a monarchy or military dictatorship.

Old Hickory, of course, viewed the situation in a much different light. Furious that an apparent “corrupt bargain” between Clay and Adams had solidified his electoral defeat in 1824 (despite having won the popular vote comfortably), Jackson captured the presidency in 1828 and again in 1832, determined to serve as a steadfast representative of the people. The political battles his White House waged with Congress, most notably on the issue of the recharter of the powerful Second Bank of the United States, focused on Jackson’s desire to play the role of Robin Hood to the nation’s elite—in essence, to weaken the monopoly of power in the hands of the few. At a time when settlers grappled with the thorny issue of Indian removal in places like Florida and Georgia, and South Carolina leaders frustrated by high tariffs threatened secession, Jackson always trusted the will and wisdom of the majority.

American Lion, author Jon Meacham’s seminal examination of Jackson’s life, notes that the president favored the work of the French philosopher François Fénelon in Telemachus. After years of political education under his mentor, Telemachus asserts that the “multitude, though fickle and capricious, does not fail sooner or later to do justice, in some measure, to true virtue.” Such words, no doubt, were akin to Jackson’s own convictions. He was aware that leadership was tragic, roiled by “disappointments and injustices and failures of imagination…” Jackson, Meacham posits, “understood that governing was provincial—no single bill or single election would ever bring about the perfections of all things–but his experience suggested that the American people, if given world enough and time, would come to a right conclusion.”

Speaking in the days after Jackson’s death, historian George Bancroft said “that the whole human mind, and therefore with it the mind of the nation, has a continuous, ever improving existence; that the appeal from the unjust legislation of to-day must be made quietly, earnestly, perseveringly, to the more enlightened collective reason of to-morrow…” As Jackson was known to say, “the people, sir—the people will set things to rights.”

Political scientist John Mueller reminds his audience that democracy is naturally based on apathy, discord, hasty compromise, inequality, and “manipulative scrambling by special interests.” Even if large and controversial solutions to national problems garner enough support, they are likely to be severely compromised compared to their original composition. This dynamic was on display in recent months during the health care debate, as Democrats did battle over the public option plan and other progressive priorities. What happened to the tense days late last year when the electorate appeared ready to back extreme measures in the face of widespread economic distress? What of Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel’s infamous, “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste,” pronouncement? The reality, though, paints President Obama as a lonely voice of power amid outcries from both his liberal base and the center he struggles to hold.

Like Jackson, Obama came to Washington as a self-proclaimed outsider; he applied lofty rhetoric in his promises to foster bipartisan support for an agenda that would tackle growing concerns in the health care, energy, and financial sectors. Obama spoke often of the necessity of restoring the trust the American people once held for their national government. The current administration was hailed as the next champion for the rights of the struggling masses, those whom were mistreated by greedy Wall Street bankers and nearsighted bureaucrats. In Jackson’s terms, the aristocracy or privileged class. Yet, after a year of rancor and infighting, Obama was left to dump the public option, cater to Democratic legislators opposed to abortion, and shower benefits on key states to produce those 60 critical votes in the Senate chamber. As Mueller made clear, freedom is unfair because it grants access and equal opportunities to all so that they may make themselves politically unequal in influence and power.

No matter what comes of the combined health care bill expected in the months ahead, Obama’s Washington would be wise to remember the words of a forgotten figure from the age of Jackson. Edward Livingston, serving as a senator from Louisiana from 1829 to 1831 and later as Jackson’s secretary of state, warned against zealotry and the “excess of party rage.” He called for calm and common sense at the height of such heated discourse:

It arrogates to itself every virtue, denies every merit to its opponents, secretly entertains the worst designs…mounts the pulpit, and, in the name of a God of mercy and peace, preaches discord and vengeance; invokes the worst scourges of Heaven, war, pestilence, and famine, as preferable alternatives to party defeat…”

Democracy has its limitations. The difficulties of governance produce special interests, political deals, and questionable compromises that, more often than not, lead nowhere. Through it all, the people “will set things to rights.” Progress is slow and incremental; if the health care bill is flawed and ineffective, new legislation will account for previous failures and the social contract will move forward. As it was in Jackson’s America, so it remains in Obama’s.

 

Comments, compliments or complaints?

Email Michael Stubel, Start the discussion or Share This...

Election Day!

I felt that today was a good day to start writing again. This is because today is the day I say I’m done helping the Republican Party. This isn’t because I’m not a Republican, but because more to the point that I have No Idea what the Republican Party stands for anymore. I’m a conservative on a ship of moderates, which if you translate that to English means that they don’t stand really for anything except the next sound bite that will move that “Party” forward toward power again. The new song today is the same song from yesterday. This is truly one of the clearest moments in all of American History to clearly delineate the differences between Socialist principles and the Conservative values the Republican Party once stood for, what Ronald Reagan once spoke about and lived and breathed everyday proving to the world, Freedom of the Individual versus the Social Justice of the Collective. The chance to succeed or fail based on our own merits and hard work Vs. being just “too big” to fail and it’s our duty to “spread the wealth around”.

Never has there been a time to make such a clear distinction between two differing mindsets….and they fail to do so. And now I know why they have failed to do so: because the “Party mentality” of the Republicans OR the Democrats is not different at all. All they care about is power, and collecting more of it in their hands and not in ours…where it belongs.

Therefore, I now believe that I have no choice but to come to the conclusion of this: There really is no difference between the “Party” mentalities any longer. The Leadership of the Republican Party is not here to espouse my principles, which they “SAY” they believe. They don’t, and now I know it, and now I’m done helping the Party. The party is dead in my heart now.

I now have decided that I will only help individuals in the future. As soon as a Leader steps up to the plate and says “Here I am, with the bumps and hard edges and flaws and foibles of a real human being, and I believe in the Conservative principles of our Founding Fathers” I will be in there corner. This is why I believe that it was a stroke of Pure Genius that Sarah Palin left the Governor’s position in Alaska and tout the Conservative values to everyone that will listen to her. This allows her to get away from what is toxic in the Republican Party, which is the Republican Party, and maybe come back as a leader to show the way back to the principles and values that this great nation, the greatest nation ever, was founded on.

I didn’t join the military, serve my country and potentially risk my life if asked, to serve a “party” or an individual…but the Constitution of the United States of America. That is the oath all service members make. We made an oath to the Constitution. And it’s about time that I uphold that oath once again.

So, I hereby resign my position as a member of the Republican Committee here in Cumberland County, PA, effective immediately. I also re-pledge my oath to the US Constitution, like I did as a member of the US military. The next real candidate that upholds and believes those conservative values and principles espoused in the Constitution steps forward, I will be standing right behind them and helping them move our country back to sanity again, but the moment they forget the principles and values is the moment I leave them in the dust. You are either for our Constitution as the Founders created and intended it, or you’re not and that will determine whether my allegiance is with you OR I’m done with you. You choose.

 

Comments, compliments or complaints?

Email Ian Hayes, Join the discussion or Share This...

Why can’t 9/11 just be a National Day of Rememberance?


Why must everything become an occasion to press the population into “service”? Here’s a press release from the Pennsylvania Department of Education:

The Pennsylvania Department of Education (PDE) is pleased to recognize September 11, 2009, as The National Day of Service and Remembrance. On April 21, 2009, President Barack Obama signed legislation that officially established September 11th as the federally recognized National Day of Service and Remembrance.

PDE joins in support of the National Day of Service and Remembrance and celebrates this great opportunity to showcase Pennsylvania and emphasize the importance of service learning. School districts and community partners are encouraged to host an event during the week of September 7 to 11, 2009 to help focus attention on volunteerism, charitable actions and service to the community. Rekindle the remarkable spirit of unity, service and compassion shared by so many Pennsylvanians in the immediate aftermath of the attack. Join PDE and many volunteers across the Commonwealth and the Nation in building an enduring and historic legacy.

Here’s the website for the 911 Day of Service website, where we are all encouraged to

post your personal plan to perform a good deed, volunteer or engage in another charitable activity in observance of the newly established September 11 National Day of Service and Remembrance. Help create a wonderful legacy that honors the victims and those who rose to service in response to the attacks on America.

Ok, I hate to always play the role of curmudgeon in the face of such touchy-feely good deed doing, but why must we have a day of Service (and, as an afterthought, Rememberance) to honor the memories of those who perished on that day eight years ago? Why can we not just honor the memories of the fallen without some AmeriCorps-type forced volunteerism? Considering that the shackles of politcal correctness prevent our government and most of our citizens from acknowledging that the War on Terror is really a War on Muslim Extremism, I think it’s a little too soon to be “celebrating” anything about 9/11.

I understand the desire to make something good come of something bad (and I think that the MLK “Day of Service” is an appropriate venue for this kind of thing.) But I also think that it is not only disrespectful of the victims, but dangerous to America to gloss over what happened on that day eight years ago. That glossing over this event over seems to have been the singular intent of the media and parts of our government in the eight intervening years is disturbing, to say the least. Do the children who are participating in this “Day of Service and Remembrance” even understand fully what happened that day? If they have not learned it at home, I doubt very sincerely they are getting a true picture from our schools.

Just before it happened, the Nation was consumed with domestic issues: Prescription drugs for seniors and the Chandra Levy disappearance. And here we are not eight years later, once again consumed with domestic issues and governemnt handouts. Not two days before 9/11 this year, the President of a nation at war on two fronts called a joint session of congress to talk about health care. Following the World Apology Tour this past spring, and now the investigation into the CIA, a very clear message is going out to the world and those who wish to tear down our way of life.

Make no mistake: that we have not experienced another 9/11 is not because our enemies have not been trying. 9/11 should be about remembering that awful day and the victims, not trying to make something good come from something bad. It is too soon for that and the motivations behind the attacks remains unresolved to this day.

Just remember.

 

Comments, compliments or complaints?

Email LisaMossie, Start the discussion or Share This...

Face to Face With Hurricane Bill: Freindly Fire Rides with the USAF “Hurricane Hunters”

Face to Face With Hurricane Bill: Freindly Fire Rides with the USAF “Hurricane Hunters”

11 Hour Mission Covered 3,000 Miles Over The Roiling Atlantic Ocean

BY CHRIS FREIND

“Jumping out of a perfectly good aircraft is not a natural act. So let’s do it right, and enjoy the view.”—Clint Eastwood’s U.S. Marine character in “Heartbreak Ridge.”

ABOARD A U.S. AIR FORCE WC-130 “HURRICANE HUNTER” — With all the celebrity status afforded “Bill,” being that he was the top story in newspapers and on television nationwide, it seemed like a good idea to make his acquaintance. After all, it’s not every day you get to meet someone, or in this case, some thing, with a magnitude as great as Bill’s. At least, that what I kept telling myself after receiving a call on a Friday evening from the U.S. Air Force “Hurricane Hunters” squadron asking if I could be at Andrews Air Force base in 24 hours. They had front-row seats to the Hurricane Bill show, and I was on the A-List.

******

A variation of Clint Eastwood’s words echoes in my mind as we sit on a rainy runway at Andrews AFB, just outside Washington, D.C:

“Flying a perfectly good aircraft into the heart of a hurricane is not a natural act.” It is midnight, and I keep telling myself that the crew will “do it right,” so I should “enjoy the view.”

The WC-130 is a venerable aircraft, so successful in its design that it is still being manufactured after 50 years. The four mighty turboprops that would carry us into the storm fired up, and we were ready to roll. Nothing could stop us now.

Except, of course, for a parade of ducks and ducklings that proceeded to cross – waddle, actually- in front of this mighty aircraft, without a care in the world. The eight-man aircrew, one of the most seasoned to ever fly a hurricane mission, were as giddy as little kids, even trying to snap photos of the unusual sight. I take this light moment as a good omen.

Moments later, after a surprisingly short sprint down the runway, we are airborne, heading east. Flying over the Chesapeake and Delaware Bays, we pass over South Jersey, where my three little children are sleeping far below. A moment of brief anxiety sets in, because, for the uninitiated such as myself, it’s only natural to think about “worst case” scenarios. We are doing the complete opposite of what people do when a hurricane nears. Instead of fleeing, we are chasing. It was going to be an interesting night.

******

The biggest difference between a WC-130 cockpit and that of a commercial airliner is the number of windows. While a typical passenger jet has four panes, our plane has 18, affording a view not just straight ahead and to the left and right, but above and below. As we progress out over the Atlantic, the first of what would be many contrasts strikes me. Peering up, the sky is crystal clear, with more stars than can be described. Hard to believe that in a short period of time, that view will be clouded over, literally, by a huge storm.

Among the various monitors and screens in the cockpit is one which depicts not just our plane’s heading, but everything in our flight path ahead. In short order, there he is, in all his glory. Bill’s familiar hurricane shape took form, and we are closing fast. It is showtime.

*******

The most common question asked by the public is how the Hurricane Hunters’ planes can withstand the power of a hurricane, since wind speeds can approach 200 miles per hour. As Major Jeff Ragusa, commander of our mission, explained, the ride is not usually as bumpy and one might expect. This is because the plane, as a moving object, is not subject to the same stresses of land-based structures. Stationary objects, such as trees, cars and buildings, either withstand a hurricane’s winds, or get blown away when they reach a breaking point.

Maj. Ragusa likened our plane to that of a swimmer in a strong current. Whether the current is 20 miles per hour or 40, the swimmer is not physically harmed because he isn’t stationary. He is simply moving with the water. Likewise, since the plane moves laterally in the hurricane’s winds, and does so at an angle, called “crabbing,” the turbulence from that force is minimal.

However, that doesn’t mean the flight is a cakewalk. The crew has to be constantly aware of extremely powerful downdrafts from the thunderstorms inside the hurricane.

For various meteorological reasons, the standard altitude for entering the hurricane is 10,000 feet, at which time the plane slows to 200 mph from its cruising speed of 320. There is another reason that the 10,000 foot level is one often adhered to by the crews – it provides a larger margin of safety.

In 2005, Hurricane Wilma progressed from a Category 1 to a Category 5 (the most powerful) faster than any other storm in history. It remains the most powerful hurricane on record, with the lowest pressure ever recorded. During a Hurricane Hunter flight into Wilma in which the plane was considerably lower than 10,000 feet, a downdraft slammed the plane 2,500 straight down in a matter of seconds. Having the ocean rush up that quickly, and be that close, is not something an aircrew wants to experience.

On Hurricane Hunter missions, the planes are an island unto themselves. Our navigator tells us during a briefing that we are the only aircraft remotely close to the storm. And since cargo ships avoid the shipping lanes affected by the hurricane, there are no surface vessels for potentially hundreds of miles.

Waves generated by Bill exceed an almost inconceivable 60 feet, and are clearly visible from our altitude two miles above the surface (upon entering the eye, the wind speed drops to zero and there is a clear view of the ocean below). Should the plane have to ditch at sea, the crew would be on its own for a considerable amount of time.

Since the Hurricane Hunters have never lost a plane (they have 10), and they have been through hurricanes’ fury countless times, I rest a bit easier knowing the odds are on my side.

*****

The Hurricane Hunters comprise the 53rd Weather Reconnaissance Squadron (WRS) based out of Keesler AFB in Biloxi, Mississippi. According to the unit’s public affairs office, it is a one-of-a-kind organization in that it is the only operational unit in the world that engages in weather reconnaissance on a routine basis. An Air Force Reserve unit, its primary mission is to perform aerial weather reconnaissance of tropical storms and hurricanes in the Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean Sea, Gulf of Mexico and the central Pacific Ocean. In a unique arrangement, the WRS is effectively directed not by the Department of Defense, but by the Department of Commerce’s National Hurricane Center. The squadron’s mission calls for the unit to be able to engage in continuous operations 24 hours per day, with the ability to fly into 3 storms at a time. Based on these requirements, the WRS is staffed with ten full-time and ten part-time aircrews.

Each aircrew includes a pilot, co-pilot, navigator, aerial reconnaissance weather officer, and a weather loadmaster. There are often several backup pilots and co-pilots, since typical mission duration is 11 hours, with some lasting 18.

The flight meteorologist acts as flight director, observing and recording meteorological data at the horizontal flight level, while the the loadmaster collects and records vertical weather data by using dropsondes, devices shot out of the airplane while inside the storm which measure temperature, humidity, barometric pressure, wind speed and wind direction. Dropsonde information is relayed back to the plane twice per second, which, after being tabulated with the horizontal data via an advanced computer program, is relayed to the National Hurricane Center at regular intervals. Other weather instruments determine rainfall amounts, ocean temperature, and wind speeds at the sea surface.

An analogy often used to describe why Hurricane Hunters fly into storms is that hurricanes are like tumors. Their presence is known, but critical details must still be ascertained, such as size, whether it is growing, how it is spreading, and the precise type of entity being studied.

Hurricane forecasters use the Hunters’ data to determine if a storm is intensifying, and where it may be heading. The mission of the Hurricane Hunters is immensely valuable because it increases the accuracy of hurricane predictions by 30%. In addition to saving countless lives, the WRS saves millions of dollars, since it costs approximately one million dollars to evacuate every one mile of coastline.

*******

The flight continues for hours, penetrating the eye eight times. We fly over Nantucket and as far north as Halifax, Canada. While visibility is limited flying through the storm, there are breathtaking views when the plane is out of the hurricane. Despite the raging seas and fierce winds so close to us, we witness a spectacular sunrise above the clouds and a rainbow for the record books. The views give an almost surreal feeling, as these tranquil scenes are occurring within sight of a savage hurricane.

After our last pass through the eye, we head for home, weary from the mission duration, the ever- present turbulence, the noise level (earplugs are worn at all times), and the utilitarian accommodations. The WC-130 is a workhorse, and it does its job flawlessly, but a comfortable airliner it is not. Metal-framed canvass seats with mesh backing are standard in the cargo hold, and there is a port-a-potty with a curtain for a bathroom. The “refrigerator” is a cooler strapped to the floor.

The WRS crew, underneath their friendly exterior, are no-nonsense, tough-as-nails airmen who face elevated risks every time they take to the skies. They perform their mission with the utmost professionalism and poise, knowing that what they do saves lives and property. Seasoned in a way unmatched by other airmen, they are the best of the best.

After sitting in the cockpit for a picture-perfect landing, I step out onto the tarmac with a newfound respect for solid ground under a clear blue sky.

While I encountered a hurricane but once, these airmen face substantial risks flight after flight. That’s true courage.

As I look back at the WC-130, thinking about the tempest we, and more importantly, it – just endured – Maj. Ragusa hands me a 53rd WRS squadron patch.

For 11 hours, I was a Hurricane Hunter – a truly unforgettable experience.

Chris Freind, author of “Freindly Fire,” is an independent columnist and investigative reporter whose home newspaper is The Philadelphia Bulletin. Readers hail from six continents, thirty countries, and all fifty states. He can be reached at CF@FreindlyFireZone.com

 

Comments, compliments or complaints?

Email Chris Freind, Start the discussion or Share This...

Cold Warriors to Obama: GROW A SET!!

And Palin had no foreign policy experience, right? (To good not to share at both blogs!)

Dissident heroes from the age of the Iron Curtain, Nobel Peace Prize laureate Lech Walesa, Vaclav Havel and 20 other Central and Eastern European intellectuals, policymakers and leaders have penned an open letter to President Obama on the perils facing US-NATO relations should he cave to the Russians — and they should know:

Despite the efforts and significant contribution of the new members, NATO today seems weaker than when we joined. In many of our countries it is perceived as less and less relevant – and we feel it. Although we are full members, people question whether NATO would be willing and able to come to our defense in some future crises.

Many in the region are looking with hope to the Obama Administration to restore the Atlantic relationship as a moral compass for their domestic as well as foreign policies. A strong commitment to common liberal democratic values is essential to our countries. We know from our own historical experience the difference between when the United States stood up for its liberal democratic values and when it did not. Our region suffered when the United States succumbed to “realism” at Yalta. And it benefited when the United States used its power to fight for principle. That was critical during the Cold War and in opening the doors of NATO. Had a “realist” view prevailed in the early 1990s, we would not be in NATO today and the idea of a Europe whole, free, and at peace would be a distant dream.

 

Comments, compliments or complaints?

Email Ed Angiolillo, Join the discussion or Share This...

The Moon Landing – 40 Years Later

That’s one small step for (a) man…

…One great big punch in the face for a pinhead with way too much time on his hands.

 

Comments, compliments or complaints?

Email John Lewandowski, Start the discussion or Share This...

Fireworks Safety

Try to be safe on Saturday.

 

Comments, compliments or complaints?

Email AlexC, Start the discussion or Share This...

Question

I thought the left was just soooooo tired of the Bush era and couldn’t wait to move on from it to the era of “hope and change.”

So why is the left spending all their time focusing on the Bush era regarding waterboarding?  I thought they wanted to forget the past and move on with life.

My warning to them is to be careful – someday they will not be in power.  They are setting the rules by which they will be judged.

 

Comments, compliments or complaints?

Email Matt Best, Start the discussion or Share This...

States on the Federal Dole, & PA Sovereignty

Money from the Federal government is now the leading revenue source for states according to a report in that leading reactionary, wingnut periodical USA Today. And this is no blip on the radar screen merely caused by the recent stimulus, although the historic levels are caused by it. This is part of a pattern. Take a look at this graph. Historically, the leading revenue source for states has been from property taxes or sales taxes, but we may have just crossed the Rubicon to permanent state dependency on the Feds.

[ht Veronique de Rugy at NRO]

This is precisely the explanation of why Rep. Sam Rohrer is taking the lead with PA HR 95. It is a sovereignty resolution for Pennsylvania. The GOP is in the lead on this, but has the support is bipartisan.

Similar movements are gaining traction in California, Oregon, Hawaii, New Hampshire, and Michigan. I only listed states that voted for Obama last election, by the way. There are plenty more.

Nevertheless, some people characterize this movement as comprised of militia type radicals with bunkers in the back yard. Those same folks also often accuse sovereignty supporters of racism, and invoke the Civil War and secession.

But it ain’t so. There are real reasons for these resolutions having to do with the nuts and bolts of how our Union runs. They aren’t about paranoia and secession, and they aren’t about partisan politics. In fact, the opposite is more likely true. Opposition to these resolutions is probably more about partisan hackary, and paranoia.

Now, will these resolutions do anything to slow the Federal government’s assault on the prerogatives of states articulated clearly in the 9th and 10th Amendments in the Bill of Rights, and confirmed by myriad textual examples in founding supporting documents like The Federalist Papers? Maybe not. And perhaps remedy is, alas, to be found in the courts by attacking New York vs. United States.

But does anyone think doing nothing will help?

 

Comments, compliments or complaints?

Email KarlBucus, Start the discussion or Share This...

Left turn at Albuquerque

When did we get to this upside down world? Did we do what Bugs Bunny said at the beginning of many of his adventures when he popped out of the ground confused about where he was? “I knew I shoulda taken a left turn at Albuquerque!” This is the phrase I’ve had to ask myself lately. I know I heard Bug’s voice in my head the other day when I listened to Mayor Bloomberg of New York City discussing the incredibly short sighted and boneheaded tower buzzing of the Air Force One through Downtown New York. During his press conference he railed on about the insensitivity of the Jumbo Jet flyby and the panic it caused to the citizens of New York and how he wants answers as to why this happened. Then in the same breath, without even missing a beat, he then said “in the end though, it’s the federal government, and they will do whatever they want to.” Huh…excuse me? Since when was this how our country functioned?

And then it occurred to me. This is the problem, and I don’t mean the federal government. I mean us, you and I. We are the problem. When an official of the government, the highest ranking official of one of the nation’s largest and most powerful cities in the country can make a blanket statement like this and it doesn’t even make a blip on the news and not a single dissenting voice in the media or by any other elected officials then it just proves to me that we as a people have forgotten who we are and where we came from. If an elected official had said such a thing in the days of the Founders, he would have found himself run right out of office if not the town itself. How far we have fallen from our beginnings.

What Mr. Bloomberg doesn’t realize is the fact that our nation and its founding documents expressly state that the power of the government rests in the hands of those it governs, not the other way around. It was placed even in our founding documents that the power of the government is derived from God to the people and then Lent to the government to serve us and ensure our Lives Liberties and Pursuit of Happiness. It further says “That whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these end it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it and institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its power is such forms as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.” This is a direct quote from our Declaration of Independence, something that apparently not too many people, and obviously not Mr. Bloomberg, have read lately if ever at all. One of our greatest founding fathers, John Adams, had this to say about freedom and democracy: “Remember democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” Is that the path we’ve chosen? Do we need to put America on Suicide Watch? Not if I can help it.

This has brought me to one crystal clear conclusion. We have forgotten the face of our fathers. We have forgotten what it really means to be Americans. To be American is not the stuff we buy or the things our government says we can do. It is living a principled life understanding that, just like our Founder’s, that there is a God, that we derive our freedoms and liberty’s from God and that we lend government the power it yields. It is also remembering that as being the source of power, it is our God-given right and Duty to starve off and choke that which forgets that government doesn’t give us our rights but that they come from God first and that government has No Power other than that which we give it. It is time to stop letting them have the power they feel they are entitled to and that it is our duty to do as they say. How wrong they really are. It is time that we taught them that lesson.

It is time that we remembered the Face of Our Fathers again.

 

Comments, compliments or complaints?

Email Ian Hayes, Start the discussion or Share This...

Ben Franklin

Today is a good day to remember one of Pennsylvania’s most famous historical figures – Ben Franklin.  Ben Franklin died on this day in 1790.  There is a ton that has been written on Franklin, here’s a Wikipedia quick summary to remind us of his contributions to mankind:

One of the Founding Fathers of the United States of America. A noted polymath, Franklin was a leading author and printer, satirist, political theorist, politician, scientist, inventor, civic activist, statesman, and diplomat. As a scientist, he was a major figure in the Enlightenment and the history of physics for his discoveries and theories regarding electricity. He invented the lightning rod, bifocals, the Franklin stove, a carriage odometer, and the glass ‘armonica’. He formed both the first public lending library in America and first fire department in Pennsylvania. He was an early proponent of colonial unity, and as a political writer and activist he supported the idea of an American nation.[1] As a diplomat during the American Revolution he secured the French alliance that helped to make independence of the United States possible.

I’ll close with one of Franklin’s most famous quotes that I think if would be wise for many of our countrymen to remember:

They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.

 

Comments, compliments or complaints?

Email Matt Best, Start the discussion or Share This...

Thoughts From An American Nobody No.5

I haven’t been able to find my muse lately. Distractions of everyday life keep rearing their ugly heads up and frightening off the thoughts that I know need to be said. But this is what all of us…all of us…have had as an excuse to not say what needs to be said. When life is more confusing, more cluttered and filled with noise is the exact time that WE MUST SPEAK. There will always be too much going on in our lives, too many headaches, too many hassles, too many people telling us we are living our lives wrong by teaching our kids to respect our elders, that there are consequences to our actions and to live up to the highest ethical standards. We say that we expect more from ourselves everyday and to try our hardest at whatever we do and we never never ever give up. We don’t ask for handouts and we always give credit where credit is due. But somehow we are the bad ones.

                Yesterday’s Tea Parties were a good start, but it’s not enough.

When I grew up, I was taught that you always referred to every adult man and woman as “Sir” and “Ma’am”. Do you normally hear a teenager of today say such things? You’ll be lucky to hear an “F*** You” if anything at all today. As a teenager, if my mother and father had known I had thought let alone actually said something so disrespectful to anyone at all I would be lucky if I was only beaten within an inch of my life. Gasp!!!! Yes, my parents did spank me, but only rarely because they taught me respect for everyone I came in contact with.

This is just one of the many things that anyone can see is wrong in our great country. It is just a symptom of an overall cancer running through the body of America, and just like any sick patient if we don’t recognize that we are truly ill and face the fact that the cure we need will feel even worse than the disease, then this “Experiment in Freedom” will die. There was a reason that Alexis de Tocqueville wrote is his masterpiece Democracy in America when he wrote

America is great because she is good, and if America ever ceases to be good, America will cease to be great.”

I was talking last night with a group of good men. This isn’t because they are great men with fancy titles or popularity or incredible influence. They are just part of the unwashed masses you and I belong to. They are American Nobodies too. But all of them have the utmost love and respect for this country and all the opportunities that being an American affords us and I know that each of them, in their own way, thanks God for being born American. All of these men are men I have the greatest admiration and respect for and all of them believe as I do that our country is upside down. Somehow we as an American society have lost that spark that made us what the world associated with being “Quintessential Americans.”

We all agree that something needs to change, but I ask myself “How do 6 men change the world?” Then I look to the Founder’s and realize that these men probably said the exact same thing to themselves. And I believe that I’ve to the same conclusions that they did. It’s is the only way the world has EVER been changed. History is never changed by large groups of people or enormous entities. It is always moved in some direction or another by individuals deciding that the way things are going is wrong and things need to change. All movements are started by just a bunch of people, Nobody’s, deciding that enough is enough and girding themselves for the long hard fight coming.

I don’t want this fight. I don’t want this struggle. No one does, no one sane that is. But this is a fight that has been coming for a very long time and many men and women before me kept passing the responsibility down the line saying “It’s not my fight; let someone else deal with it.” Things will never change unless someone stands up and says “I don’t want to fight this, but it is my responsibility now. I accept.” Well, I Accept. I will fight this fight for the same reasons that one of the greatest of America’s Founder’s, John Adams, wrote to his wife. He said

“I must study politics and war, that my sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy. My sons ought to study mathematics and philosophy…. in order to give their children a right to study painting, poetry, music, architecture, statuary, tapestry, and porcelain.”

In other words, never pass your duties and responsibilities onto others when it is your duty to do the hard work. It is my duty now….and I accept. And I believe that others will begin to accept their duties too.

                The Tea Parties were a good start, but now it’s time to roll up our sleeves and do the hard work.

 

Comments, compliments or complaints?

Email Ian Hayes, Start the discussion or Share This...